The Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (RSPCA) finds itself at the center of a controversy following remarks made by its president, Chris Packham. The incident has led to the animal welfare organization being reported to the Charity Commission, the regulator of charities in England and Wales.
During an Action for Wildlife Day event in Derbyshire earlier this month, Packham, who is also vice-president of the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB), made contentious statements regarding Barclays bank customers. His comments suggested that individuals banking with Barclays should engage in self-harm due to the bank's investments in fossil fuels.
In response, Greg Smith, the shadow business minister, has reported both the RSPCA and RSPB to the Charity Commission. Smith expressed concern about the potential impact of such statements on public discourse, particularly in light of recent civil unrest.
The controversy stems from Packham's criticism of Barclays' role in financing the fossil fuel industry. Environmental campaigners claim that since 2016, Barclays has directed £186 billion towards this sector, making it Europe's largest fossil-fuel backer.
Both the RSPCA and RSPB have responded to the situation. The RSPB distanced itself from Packham's remarks, stating that while he aligns with their charitable objectives, they do not necessarily agree with all his views. The RSPCA, while not condoning the specific comments, expressed pride in having Packham as their president, citing his passion for animal welfare.
This incident is not Packham's first brush with controversy. He previously presented a program questioning the ethics of breaking the law in climate protests, which also drew criticism.
Barclays has faced numerous protests in recent months, including demonstrations by pro-Palestine activists and Extinction Rebellion. The bank has stated its commitment to financing the energy transition and aims to become a net-zero bank by 2050. From 2024, Barclays plans to cease providing direct finance for new oil and gas projects.
The Charity Commission has acknowledged the concerns raised and is currently assessing the situation to determine if further action is necessary.
"Mr Packham's most recent comments are the latest in an escalating series of bizarre histrionics that he has shown no willingness to control."
This incident highlights the complex relationship between public figures, charitable organizations, and controversial issues. It also underscores the ongoing debate surrounding the role of financial institutions in addressing climate change and the methods employed by environmental activists to effect change.