Homeowner Claims £600k Loss Due to Council's Bulging Wall

A Gloucestershire resident alleges a council-owned car park wall has significantly devalued his £1 million farmhouse. The dispute highlights ongoing tensions between property owners and local authorities over infrastructure maintenance.

October 2 2024, 11:39 AM  •  57 views

Homeowner Claims £600k Loss Due to Council's Bulging Wall

In a contentious property dispute, a homeowner in the picturesque village of South Woodchester, Gloucestershire, has alleged that a deteriorating council-owned car park wall has substantially reduced the value of his residence. Andrew Ewart-James, the 78-year-old owner of Home Farm, a property valued at approximately £1 million, claims the issue has slashed £600,000 from his home's worth.

The crux of the problem lies in a 12-foot retaining wall separating Ewart-James' garden from a seven-space car park managed by Stroud District Council. While retaining walls are crucial structures designed to support soil at unnatural slopes, this particular wall has reportedly been "lurching forward" into the garden over the past five years.

Ewart-James, who acquired the property in 1977, expressed his frustration with the situation:

"I feel trapped. I am fed up with the council – they never say anything, never respond to me and never say what they are doing."

Andrew Ewart-James stated:

The homeowner's predicament is compounded by his desire to sell the property following his wife's passing. However, he believes the wall's condition will deter potential buyers, effectively leaving him in a difficult position.

In response to the perceived inaction, Ewart-James has initiated High Court proceedings against Stroud District Council, seeking damages. This legal action underscores the complexities often associated with disputes between property owners and local authorities in the UK.

The council, for its part, has acknowledged the issue and taken preliminary steps to address it. They have erected scaffolding to support the wall temporarily and conducted comprehensive structural and geotechnical surveys. These surveys are crucial in collecting and interpreting geological data for construction purposes, enabling structural engineers to design appropriate repairs.

A spokesperson for Stroud District Council stated:

"We have conducted essential preliminary work to identify the cause of the wall's movement and determine the appropriate course of action. Comprehensive structural and geotechnical surveys are now complete and our structural engineers have finalised the design for the repairs."

Council spokesperson commented:

The council also emphasized the complexity of the case, citing the scale, construction type, and location as contributing factors. They assured that public safety remains their priority and that they have been keeping the property owner informed throughout the process.

This dispute highlights the broader challenges faced by local authorities in maintaining public infrastructure amidst budget constraints. It also underscores the significant impact that structural issues can have on property values and saleability, particularly in sought-after rural areas like Gloucestershire.

Image

The situation at Home Farm is set against the backdrop of a dynamic UK housing market, which has experienced considerable fluctuations in recent years. In Gloucestershire, known for its picturesque countryside and historic villages, property values have been on an upward trend. As of 2023, the average house price in the county was around £330,000, making Ewart-James' farmhouse a particularly valuable asset.

The Cotswolds, which encompasses parts of Gloucestershire, is designated as an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, further enhancing the region's appeal to property buyers. This context amplifies the potential impact of structural issues on high-value properties like Home Farm.

As the dispute continues, it serves as a reminder of the intricate relationship between property owners, local authorities, and the maintenance of public infrastructure. The outcome of this case could have implications for similar situations across the UK, where the balance between preserving property values and managing public resources remains a delicate issue.